Cherry picking facts with no new or compelling evidence
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Trying to paint Farqueson as a Lindy Chamberlin or Kathleen Folbigg is as in poor taste as using the poor dead mothers voice before the EVIDENCE changed her mind.
There is no new or compelling evidence to support a claim of innocence, just some BS hypotheses and grade school experiments the presenter admits wouldn’t hold up in court. Farqueson is a family annihilator and is exactly where he belongs”
Even they're generous via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
07/06/24
More reviews of Trial by Water
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The reporting is incredibly biased. I enjoyed Caro Meldrum Hannah’s reporting on Keli Lane because it made me question everything. This is just shoving the case for innocence down our throats to the point that I’m thinking this bloke is guilty as sin. Needs to be more balanced - repeating that...”Read full review »
Hannahglebe via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/24/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“It’s interesting that during episode one, the offender is described as this “very likeable guy” as if that’s somehow a reason he couldn’t have done this horrible thing.
Two juries thought differently, and I’m not sure what “scientific evidence” would change their minds.”
Vorsterlicious via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/09/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Interesting and compelling content but the music is horrendous and very distracting”
Mama Afreaka via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/03/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
