Cherry picking facts with no new or compelling evidence
Trying to paint Farqueson as a Lindy Chamberlin or Kathleen Folbigg is as in poor taste as using the poor dead mothers voice before the EVIDENCE changed her mind. There is no new or compelling evidence to support a claim of innocence, just some BS hypotheses and grade school experiments the presenter admits wouldn’t hold up in court. Farqueson is a family annihilator and is exactly where he belongs
Even they're generous via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 07/06/24
More reviews of Trial by Water
I’m aware of how easy it is to become swayed by the ‘recency effect’ - the last thing you read or hear impacting one’s judg bent, however the podcast, along with the recommended reading (Road to Damnation) does provide a lot of food for thought. As an ‘expert witness as well as content witness...Read full review »
Rastius 2 via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/10/24
Obviously it’s a difficult listen and I’m glad poor Cindy is not here to listen to this. Despite this man being found guilty several times and his appeals quashed, I’m unsure what Hedley believes there is more to it.. but I am eager to listen and find out! Hedley is a brilliant podcaster 👏🏼
ausinlondon via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/03/24
I’d give this a zero if that was possible. Cherry picked aspects of this case that you could twist into a story using some very questionable ‘experts’ while ignoring the rest of the case against the convicted killer. One your so called ‘expert’s’ description of the car sinking completely...Read full review »
Hudsmum via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/13/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »