“This podcast shared outdated information on social media about vaccines impacting cycle length. Despite a recently published research finding that confirms stat sig difference overall and clinical significance in patients who received 2 vaccines in one sitting in the journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
The women who run this podcast have not completed field research since they left college and they are publishing data on social media as fact when they are not active in the field they share info for. And they’re sharing this data without peer review.
It’s sad the disservice these two serve to science. They blocked me for pointing out this flaw and lack of integrity to research. Which is the biggest red flag of their credibility. How can one claim to share unbiased science yet they block pages that point out incorrect information? As a vaccinated scientist I’m offended by the lies these women spread and their inability to correct posts of unscientific claims that have been debunked by peer reviewed research.
I have reported the doctor they’re using to share outdated memes to the Texas board because they are using her MD title to contradict published scientists and their research.”
Go Amber! via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/09/22