“I’m really appreciating the depth of reporting, and detail amassed to tell this story. I’m finding fascinating. But in Ep5 you imply that the conviction was made on the (1 out of 3) confessions - alone? And let us go along asking “what about the weapons” the whole episode. Seems like deceptive story telling by the time you wait right until the end before addressing the murder weapons. It’s getting too genre and not enough journalism by this point. (Note my rating improves to a 4 now… credit where credit is due, but the tropes are a hinderance to my enjoyment.)”
Keith Duddy via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
10/22/24