Podcast Uses Wikipedia for Information-- Not very structured or researched
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I was looking forward to my first podcast of this, but in the first few sentences, the reader said the source for the information was Wikipedia and I was disappointed, because it isn't exactly the best place to get valid information, and I could've done that in my spare time anyway. Maybe if they use better, more trustworthy sources instead of just reading off the Wikipedia page, I'll become more enthusiastic about this podcast, but for now, I'm just going to take everything they say with a grain of salt.”Read full review »
Jojo Chanrio via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/12/08
More reviews of U.S. Presidents Podcast
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This series is an excellent way to provide high school students, as well as adults, in the digital age with additional learning opportunities. I shared these podcasts on CD as gifts for history buff friends of mine. Please continue to add to this series while maintaining the integrity of the...”Read full review »
Kricket Kay via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/28/07
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“These are very interesting but how come there are no more? Why doesnt itunes ever respond to qusetions?”Read full review »
tfriggenv via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/22/08
“If it's all right with you to listen to someone read a Wikipedia article, go right ahead. I, for one, am horrified. From sentence to sentence, you never can trust the source. Was this line added by an uninformed undergraduate? Was that sentence inserted by a right-wing activist who wanted to...”Read full review »
historyknurd via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/19/08
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
