More engagement needed.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I love the chosen topics and the guests are generally top notch; but I dislike the execution.
Host Jeffrey Rosen winds up each of his two guests with an open-ended question. Each speech from each guest ends with the Jeffrey saying something like “Joe, that was a remarkably cogent and well considered synopsis! Jane, what do you think?” Then Jane gives her 2-3 minute speech and Jeffrey thanks her and asks a different question, then more speeches, more plaudits, etc. I find this format difficult to follow. The speeches are dense and need to be explained to the layperson.
I’d like more engagement, more follow-up questions that are tied to the ideas of a given speaker. Something like “OK, Jane, but doesn’t that conflict with the basic rights set out in Gideon v. Wainwright?” Or maybe, “Jane, does 'outside actor’ in this sense mean anyone who isn’t part of the original case?””Read full review »
boberonicus via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/13/15
More reviews of We the People
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Well done, thoughtful and extremely timely.”
Arflynn23 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/11/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love this podcast, love learning about the constitution.
Check out @letstalktheconstitution on insta for more”
Xxcherie via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/30/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“We The People provides great insight into topical policies as they are being discussed either in courts or across the nation. Experts are provided on each side of an argument to explore the in’s and out’s of policy and, most importantly, the policy’s alignment with the constitution. Accompanied...”Read full review »
Bsheeley via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/02/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
