Plus: Biden gets serious about new judges.

The most restrictive abortion ban in the country may be designed to take down Roe v. Wade.

Since June Medical Services v. Russo, everything's changed. What's next?

The legal battle lines for 2021 are taking shape!

Plus, which state legislature hates your body the most?

Pack the courts with a real one.

The Senate: thoughtful and deliberative institution or undemocratic wankers?

The Biden administration got off to a flying start, but we have one important suggestion.

Fascists will no longer be running the department—they'll be targeted by it.

To honor the absurd shenanigans of the Roe v. Wade arguments, we complete our mini-series with a reality tv-style reunion episode that will leave you with all the feels.

When is a case not a case? When the plaintiff doesn't have a right to sue! And would you believe that Texas tried to argue that Jane Roe didn't even have a right to be in court? Buckle up for episode three of our five-part roller coaster on the grandmama of all abortion cases.

Our third episode on Roe v. Wade puts the ol’ magnifying glass on a simple but messy question: what gives a state the right to regulate what kind of medicine someone accesses?

Today, our two legal heroines embark on part 2 of their five-part dive into Roe v. Wade to answer the age old question: what's more important, a living pregnant person or a group of cells that exist inside them? It’s a real head-scratcher!

Welcome to the re-release of We’ll Hear Arguments, a mini-series from the Boom! Lawyered team that dives into the dramatic arguments of the most important Supreme Court cases in history. And of course we had to begin with Roe v. Wade...

Last year, we made a thing we love, and now it's coming to the Boom! Lawyered feed, too! Here's what it's all about.

Covering the Supreme Court these last four years has been a real roller coaster.

In other words, who counts as a person?

Will the Affordable Care Act survive this latest legal assault?

Under the guise of "religious freedom," does the Constitution mandate government discrimination?

Imani Gandy and Jessica Mason Pieklo use Amy Coney Barrett's first day as a Supreme Court justice to take stock of her wildly inappropriate appearance with Trump last night and more.

It's official. With the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court today, conservatives now have a 6-3 majority and a death-grip on the institution. What now?

On Wednesday, Barrett flubbed the basics of the First Amendment, refused to denounce poll taxes, and couldn't confirm a right to privacy exists.

On Tuesday, Amy Coney Barrett refused to answer a lot of questions — but still managed to make some pretty wild statements on health care, the LGBTQ community, and more.