Stick to what you know
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I usually agree with the views on Potomac Watch. But The podcast’s (allysia?) attempt to explain CBAMs, carbon vs carbon equivalents, and what constitutes “air pollution” makes it sound like they just read something on a message board. Regardless if your position on the topic, at least be able to explain it correctly…e.g. understand that air pollutants like nox and Sox are included in “carbon equivalent”.”
jbs1526 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/22/23
More reviews of WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch
“Good podcast”
Ryan3263 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/30/17
“Intelligent analysis. These people can think.”
GeorgeEichert via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/05/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“While I realize that this is an "opinion" podcast, I was hoping for a more objective, well-balanced podcast. But the viewpoints of the three hosts are all decidedly one-sided (conservative) without much discussion of counterpoints. I realize that WSJ always tended to be conservative in...”Read full review »
yec987 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/17/17
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
