Fox News-ish analysis certainlay not non-partisan
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This WSJ podcast is the 156th most popular on itune news and politics offerings; there's a reason it's so poorly rated in spite of it's WSJ pedigree.
I was terribly disappointed when I listened to Potomac Watch. On the recent Paris Climate Change Agreement episode it was shocking to hear that Gigot and his two contributor's knowledge of the withdrawal's effect on foreign policy, international trade or even macroeconomics was akin to what you'd expect to hear from three insurance salesman having a discussion at lunch in Tulsa. Being conservative is certainly fine, not understanding the counter-arguments or effects of a decision with a clear-eyed analysis isn't.”Read full review »
t78tt.r via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/11/17
More reviews of WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Never miss an episode. WSJ editorial board offers the best and most reliable center-right commentary.”
Austin Owl via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/03/16
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’m a centrist who prefers fact-based discourse. Potomac watch was often illuminating during the election but lately has fallen short, opting for just so arguments about tax policies and mockery of liberalism. The podcast is still occasionally illuminating about Congress, and managing a complex...”Read full review »
kaloleina via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/01/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I am an independent and appreciate listening to both sides. However, these commentators are entrenched in their ideas. They sometimes stretch so far to find a positive spin to Trump that I find nothing informative in what they say.”
sharp rabbit via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/09/16
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
