Hi everyone,I am very happy for the first program last month, which got a lot of praises, especially one from my high school`s English teacher Mary, she is my good friend, and she gave me more affirmation and confidence to go on doing this English learning program.Today we are going to discuss trust, what is trust? Listen to the dialogues between Nail and Rob and here we go.   As well as bringing the world to a halt,the coronavirus epidemic has led to an increase in misinformation, lies and conspiracy theories on the internet.   In an era of fake news,where even a president of the United States is accused of spreading misinformation,   Could it be that we are living through a crisis in trust?   What is trust?   And who should we place our trust in?   These are some of the questions we`ll be discussing in this program.   And we`ll be hearing from a philosopher who believes the problem is not about trust itself but about trustworthiness -the ability to be trusted as being honest and reliable.   And as always we`ll be learning some related vocabulary along the way.   Of course telling lies and lacking trustworthiness is nothing new,just think of the Trojan Horse used to trick the ancient Greeks.    More recently,the American financier Bernie Madoff became infamous as ‘the biggest swindler in history’.   In 2009 he was sentenced to 150 years in prison for his part in the Ponzi scam,but how much did he defraud from investors?   That`s my quiz question.   Was it:a) 6.5 million dollars,b) 65 million dollars or c) 65 billion dollars?   I`ll say b) 65 million dollars.   Ok, Rob,we`ll come back to that later.   Generally speaking,trust can be described as a judgment that someone can be believed and relied upon.   When we trust each other it makes life easier,quicker and friendlier.   Society can`t function without trust-so does that mean the more trust the better?   Well,not according to philosopher,Onora O`Neill.   He says we have another word,which is gullible,and if you simply place trust indiscriminately without making a judgment about whether the other person or institution is trustworthy,then just trusting to luck as we say,is probably not a virtue.   There`s a difference between trusting someone because you have good reason to believe them and being gullible -that`s easy to deceive because you trust and believe people too quickly.   If you don`t judge who is trustworthy and who is not,you are trusting to luck-simply believing or hoping that things will happen for the best.   But being gullible and trusting to luck is exactly how Bernie Madoff was able to trick so many people into giving him their money.   Their biggest mistake was to trust him indiscriminately- in a way that does not show care or judgment,usually with harmful results.   So, if indiscriminately trusting people is such a bad idea ,how do we avoid it?   How can we tell who is trustworthy and who is not?   Onora O`Neill gives some details,an individual or organization is trustworthy is they can justifiably be trusted.   To be trustworthy they need three ingredients.   First,honesty-people have to be able to believe what they`re told.   Second,competence.   Beyond honesty and competence there`s a third element to trustworthiness:reliability.   That`s the boring one.   That`s just being honest and competent each time,so that it`s not enough to be episodically honest and competent for some of the things you claim to be able to do but not others.   Philosopher Onora O`Neill identifies three ingredients for trustworthiness:honesty, competence and reliability.   Competence means the ability to do something well.   You would trust a car mechanic to fix your broken car engine, but you wouldn`t go to them for dental work- they`re not competent to remove your tooth like a dentist is.   And you wouldn`t trust your dentist to