Waste of time
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I expected a scholarly review and mature discussion of Supreme Court cases. Instead I listened sophomoric drivel and cursing. It remains true, foul language is a crutch for the ignorant. Constant snickering and chuckling over who could be the most profane. The female guest actually uttered “allahu akbar” when it was mentioned that Rehnquist and Scalia we’re now deceased. No wonder the presenters are former lawyers.”
Swimmer2016 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/12/20
More reviews of 5-4
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I was expecting lawyerly y’all about constitutional issues. This is 180 degrees from that. I can not even explain how amazing this podcast is. If I could give above 5 stars I would. So so soo great. Do listen.”
PmoneyTheGreat via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/11/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Highly recommended”
Ahmedbright via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/24/20
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Other, better SCOTUS podcasts feature expert analysis from top lawyers with actual SCOTUS experience. Not sure if the hosts of this slog have even been inside the Supreme Court building. The first two episodes offer warmed-over "legal realist" analysis of cases that have been analyzed in...”Read full review »
ArmandWillis via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
03/06/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
