Hardtalk
The Steven Sacker interviews are structured such that he asked a negative question, the interviewer rebukes it and then they move on to the next question with no counter at all. The Farage and Woodward interviews are a case in point. Farage was talking mostly nonsense but was not in anyway pressed about any of his views. Woorward rebuked every single question and again on some points needed to be taken to task. Asked whether money had contaminated football. He was adamant completely and utterly not when clearly there is evidence to suggest it has. Tim Sebastian did not let anyone off the hook at all, ever. The interviews of others such as Patrick Stewart which are essentially just a normal interview are fine.
Smiler998 via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 04/02/13
More reviews of HARDtalk
相当好 有思想 顺带锻炼听力 很好~~~~~~!
O小疤O via Apple Podcasts · China · 08/28/12
Generally the topics are interesting and relevant. Fabulous guests who make the podcast interesting. I applaud most of the guests who venture into these interviews fully knowing the extent of hard-left bias and constant interruptions. The show should be renamed “hard-left” instead of “hard-talk”....Read full review »
Simon C72 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/20/20
the name of this show should be Hard to talk. why would you invite a guess if you don’t allow them to talk. Better run a monologue show. Audience would probably enjoy more.
yi_jerry via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/24/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »