So Many Questions
First, I don’t understand all the low ratings. Seems sus. Second, this is a master class on defense and creating reasonable doubt. Third, it strikes me that there was an opportunity to check for canine dna in the lacerations. The human dna seems less likely to prove anything criminal than it does that the victim was in close contact with all of the possible suspects prior to his death, which was never in question. The dog however, if canine dna was found on his body, it would blow the whole case for the prosecution as it would show John had been in the house and therefore severely undermine the testimony of the occupants and what happened that night. Karen (such an unfortunate name now) could prove her innocence instead of just not being guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Hagstoz via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/06/24
More reviews of Karen
Sorry. Nope. This whole charging-for-podcasts thing is ridiculous. Releasing one and then putting the rest behind a paywall? Gimme a break.
RealHorrorShow via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/22/24
I love love love true crime podcasts. I don't expect them to be big media productions or to have music or other shenanigans. However, this podcast was thrown together. It is so poorly produced, as voices overlap and clips clash. Moreover, it might as well be named Karen Read Didn't Do It....Read full review »
TJoHo via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/14/24
Should’ve guessed since the podcast is named Karen the story would be titled in her favor, but it’s almost comically biased. As a previous rater noted, it misinterprets events and only gives credence to defense strategies. During voir dire for the second trial, potential jurors should be asked if...Read full review »
BigCat415 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/28/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.