“Pros:
Interesting story.
Cons:
-Seems like the documentary maker was inspired by the Serial series and thought it would be simple to write and produce a captivating story. Unfortunately this Isn't journalism. Instead this was unprepared aimless accusations and inferences that were inarticulately conveyed and judgmental.
Suggestions:
-Higher a writer and editor with mainstream experience, then follow the script closely. A reliable narrator should be succinct and clear with well researched material. A narrative arc will provide entertainment value.
-A little self awareness goes a long way. One so upset by "armchair" detectives may be one himself. When your preach to the audience and host, you sound pompous and defensive.
-Take your own advice and don't, "Bend the narrative to fit your theory."
-constructive criticism is crucial to future success. One might think a person unable to evolve and hear critique is immature and unaware.
Special Note:
-a girl is a child. This person was a woman.”Read full review »
Mrs.Frondie via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/23/15
“I listened to this with an open mind hoping that it would be a good investigation of the facts and myths surrounding the case. But psychics, and psycho-babble from two armchair detectives is what you get here. Disappointing, as I was hoping this would be a good investigation based on science and...”Read full review »
Canadian His-Tory via Apple Podcasts ·
Canada ·
09/28/15
“Good at points but overall incredibly amteurish. These guys seem to not know very much about audio or how to pace and edit an audio piece. I doubt their "documentary" will be any better.”Read full review »
JeffreyBaughman via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/06/15