Great content but annoying hosts
The content is great and I enjoy keeping up with developments in science with help of this podcast. However, some of the interviews are recorded over poor quality phone lines, which makes it hard to comprehend. In combination with often hard to understand accents of interviewees, certain segments of podcasts are unlistenable. Enhancement in quality of audio would solve the problem. In addition, this podcasts features one of theist annoying hosts. Several times during every interview story is interrupted by comments like "huh", "hm", "wow!", "ha", "aha" etc. after listening to several podcasts, this unnecessary and unprofessional exclamations start to annoy and ultimately deteriorate further the quality of podcast.Read full review »
Chess.com player via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/08/12
More reviews of Science Magazine Podcast
akki via · 03/12/14
I don't miss any of the podscat, but I think that it could be improved a lot with a few changes. First, the voice of the broadcaster is quite nice, but she doesn't show any positive or negative emotions to the findings. It could be an amazing finding or a terrible one… and she keeps...Read full review »
Paul Keres via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/17/14
The two academic journals I absolutely must stay up to date with are Science and Nature so I was delighted to find this podcast on itunes. This is a great podcast and I cant fault the delivery of the program at all. I find it pretty easy to listen to myself and incredibly fascinating....Read full review »
Abigail..456 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 04/29/10
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »