Listen to learn.
The four hosts are thoughtful and knowledgeable. They review and condense information for me. They freely share their take on why and how they think the legal world should be organized. I don’t have to agree in order to get the benefit of hearing another persons insight. Let’s face it, even the justices of the Supreme Court have their inherent biases running at a deep personal level. And so, the personal history matters when they come to make their decisions. Justice Tom Clark and the decision in Mapp vs. Ohio (367 US 643) is a good example.
JCKII via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/18/19
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
This podcast is hosted by two terrific legal minds who are informed and able to share their information coherently. This is not background music. You need to concentrate but I view that as a really good thing. No 1.5 for this baby. The only thing I can fault it with is sometimes the vocal fry...Read full review »
Emily@juniorbookworm via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 12/09/19
As a law student, I wanted to like this podcast. To get to the point, this podcast is smug, intellectually bankrupt, and fatally biased. Given polarization and the importance and complexity of SCOTUS cases, acknowledging different legal perspectives and philosophies is critical. The hosts...Read full review »
Rhaegar via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/09/20
I am so excited for this pod. All 4 hosts are brilliant, informed, witty watchers of the Court.
LinzCHarrison via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/22/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »