Listen to learn.
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The four hosts are thoughtful and knowledgeable. They review and condense information for me. They freely share their take on why and how they think the legal world should be organized. I don’t have to agree in order to get the benefit of hearing another persons insight.
Let’s face it, even the justices of the Supreme Court have their inherent biases running at a deep personal level. And so, the personal history matters when they come to make their decisions. Justice Tom Clark and the decision in Mapp vs. Ohio (367 US 643) is a good example.”
JCKII via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/18/19
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love this show already and the rapport and expertise of the ladies. As a non-attorney it would be nice to have you provide some quick definitions or layman’s terms of more complex concepts (pretextual? Remanding in the context of a census?). Otherwise keep up the great work :)”
sennheiserz via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/01/19
“Love hearing about the cases from these intelligent women but it would be nice if they would leave their political opinions out of it.”
regrun1 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/05/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is the SCOTUS review podcast that everyone needs in their lives. The women layout the facts and arguments of each case intelligently, and they keep you engaged as they discuss the issues presented. This is not a dry podcast that will put you to sleep.”
Katie_B. via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/22/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
