Listen to learn.
The four hosts are thoughtful and knowledgeable. They review and condense information for me. They freely share their take on why and how they think the legal world should be organized. I don’t have to agree in order to get the benefit of hearing another persons insight. Let’s face it, even the justices of the Supreme Court have their inherent biases running at a deep personal level. And so, the personal history matters when they come to make their decisions. Justice Tom Clark and the decision in Mapp vs. Ohio (367 US 643) is a good example.
JCKII via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/18/19
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
Ugh, I wanted to like it, but it’s way too heavy handed and outrage mongerish. It’s like they just pash around the grand stand for an hour and a half and call it good.
AmyH145 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/02/19
really enjoyed the first teaser episode that discussed the last SCOTUS term- as they mentioned it’s not BRO-TUS or SCRO-TUS- a much needed group of voices who will be analyzing and explaining the significance of SCOTUS opinions to other lawyers and the general public. It was smart and fun- a...Read full review »
Seemamo via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/02/19
Absolutely amazing. Especially the oral argument breakdowns, behind the scenes from former SCOTUS clerks, and of course, melody’s music choice.
juliaclaire5 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/30/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »