Love the show, with one caveat
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Love this show already and the rapport and expertise of the ladies. As a non-attorney it would be nice to have you provide some quick definitions or layman’s terms of more complex concepts (pretextual? Remanding in the context of a census?). Otherwise keep up the great work :)”
sennheiserz via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/01/19
More reviews of Strict Scrutiny
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“First episode was good! It’s a solid premise and I appreciate any platform for female voices in the legal community. Some of the discussion was quite interesting in episode 1, like with the lost constitution.
The one-sidedness of the podcast is a bit disappointing. For example, framing...”Read full review »
Hobbes714 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/02/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Can't miss formula delivers expected results. Four brilliant and insightful scholars/practitioners provide an hour-plus of well-informed, accessible, and frequently funny analysis of the SCOTUS ecosystem. First episode consumed voraciously. Looking forward to seconds, thirds, etc.”Read full review »
Maxwell House Voting Rights via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
07/06/19
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Great content and explanation but I do have to mention the vocal fray is excessive irritating at times.”
1234inform via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
09/08/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
