Underwhelming and too general
I had high hopes for this and was truly excited to hear difficult conversations from opposing views. Unfortunately it felt like a 2 against 1 conversation that stayed within more extreme positions and not the real conversations. I feel like it amped up the extreme tones in media instead of bringing some grounding. I was also disappointed in how brief some of the discussion was, it seemed to skirt some real information and the facts. To talk about adding or removing justices as a solution vs. discussing maybe how conservatives feel about judicial restraint and activism from the bench. I’ll give it one more try, but Jamie Weinstein at NR definitely does a better job on bipartisan conversations.
stina123087 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/11/18
More reviews of Matter of Opinion
I have a temporary visceral reaction to everytime I hear people say they will have to agree to disagree because intellectually I know that is a copout. So, when I saw this podcast mention in the NYT I had to listen out of curiosity to see if these 3 could have a discussiong that wouldn't...Read full review »
Bluerootsradio via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 12/01/18
Outstanding Good balance and thoughtful opinions from across town he political spectrum
Skeerad via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/12/18
I am deeply concerned that polarized partisan politics are encouraging a simplified and caricatured approach to complex issues. I welcome reporting that encourages us to grapple with complexity rather than simply extolling unilateral views. By bringing three differing perspectives together in...Read full review »
JoySheridan via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/17/18
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »