Underwhelming and too general
I had high hopes for this and was truly excited to hear difficult conversations from opposing views. Unfortunately it felt like a 2 against 1 conversation that stayed within more extreme positions and not the real conversations. I feel like it amped up the extreme tones in media instead of bringing some grounding. I was also disappointed in how brief some of the discussion was, it seemed to skirt some real information and the facts. To talk about adding or removing justices as a solution vs. discussing maybe how conservatives feel about judicial restraint and activism from the bench. I’ll give it one more try, but Jamie Weinstein at NR definitely does a better job on bipartisan conversations.
stina123087 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/11/18
More reviews of Matter of Opinion
Since the Trump's election I have been trying to understand where is going the conservative movement in the USA. When I listen to Republicain polititians, I mostly hear bad faith, very, very bad faith. The Kavanaugh nomination was a good example of this Republicain bad faith, and it was...Read full review »
Chris Bagued via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 10/29/18
I will rate this five stars for now, but come on. A half hour is not enough. Go the full hour. Plus, with all due respect, the Times should have the power to put all the opinion writers into the ring. Dowd v. Douthat. Krugman v. Stephens. Collins v. Weiss. Come on!
christoby3398 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/01/18
Intelligent and thoughtful conversation from my favorite columnists. It’s also delightful, as when they talk about film or seltzer. Keep it coming!
crainiummmm via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/20/18
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.