Disappointing
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I was looking forward to hearing all about the details of court proceedings but they miss the mark. There’s so much padding to the episodes such repetitiveness and lack of focus on what is presented in court. Such extraneous information such as “the photo was enlarged so the jurors could see it” and “they could also watch it on their individual IPads they’ve been issued with” rather than tell the listener of the details and minutiae of what was in the photo.
Sadly the women presenters sound girly/giggly and out of their depth, as though they’re presenting a high school assignment. I hope they learn and grow into their potential podcasters”
Blondarama via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
05/25/24
More reviews of The Missing Campers Trial
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I agree with the previous comment. No mention of when it’s going to be available, then you put up a 15 minute episode??”
Eddhud FG ki via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
03/08/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“People who listen to podcasts and provide reviews and feedback are engaged audience, not “trolls” as characterised by one listener. I, along with many others, have expressed identical negative feedback because it is legitimate critique. Those who label negative feedback as “trolling” lack...”Read full review »
Hold The Fries via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
05/16/24
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“I’m curious about this case. The story coupled with the presenters being journalists from the court room can often make for compelling updates. Such was the case with Claremont: The Trial. Whilst some updates from Court have been very interesting to hear, I do find it rather annoying that ahead...”Read full review »
I-trance via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
06/04/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
