Court reporters are not court stenographers.
Liz Hull and Caroline Cheetham had a chance to make a journalistic mark here, but they have long since abandoned any pretence of journalistic integrity with this case. At a time when two UK newspapers of record, at opposite ends of the political spectrum (The Guardian and The Telegraph ) have published bombshell articles about this case, and an avalanche of leading experts in relevant fields have come out to criticise the egregiousness of the ‘evidence’, Liz Hull and Caroline Cheetham continue to utilise absolutely zero journalistic integrity or skill. Sorry, but this is weak journalism and it will age like milk.
Electricdreaming via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 07/12/24
More reviews of The Trial of Lucy Letby
The journalists seem either unable or unwilling to entertain the idea that Lucy Letby’s conviction is unsafe. They provide weak arguments for maintaining their position (I.e. that Lucy is guilty), and use deflection tactics to dismiss the valid concerns raised by statisticians and medical...Read full review »
Isla1764 via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 09/06/24
That was an hour of my life I’ll never get back… extremely biased, I don’t know why they bothered as they clearly had their minds made up from the beginning. The hosts were very disparaging to people who question the safety of Lucy’s conviction. If I’d realised those hosting were Daily Mail...Read full review »
CGreviews123 via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 09/18/24
I know this is the Daily Mail but surely even they would choose reporters who can at least pronounce common words properly. It’s so irritating to hear “graph” with a flat ‘a’ over and over. I hope we get to hear more from professionals like professor Jane Hutton. Although they call it...Read full review »
Aldjdoueb via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 09/10/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.