Review of Trial by Water - Biased and a bit condescending

Biased and a bit condescending

☆

“It’s well resourced in terms of sound quality and the research and interviews that have been gathered, but the “journalism” is pretty woeful. Frankly, it just seems like a poorly mounted case for the defence. The fact that despite the resources and re-enactments they’re unable to produce any compelling evidence of his innocence, kinda makes the podcast feel like you’re being preached to. If the makers had weighted the episodes evenly and presented evidence for both sides (say 3 episodes on his guilt, 3 on his innocence) rather than a focus on debunking the prosecutions evidence (which they couldn’t do convincingly) then it would have at least been informative. The success of Garner’s book on the case is she makes the reader feel as if they have autonomy in deciding for themselves. This podcast tries to force an opinion down your throat that most people will find difficult to swallow. I know I did.”

munrode via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/26/24

More reviews of Trial by Water

See all »

Bee Grant

☆

“The first episode has me hooked! Thoughtful and compelling story telling and brilliantly produced.”

Bee Grant via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/16/24

Compelling when paired with some further reading

☆

“I’m aware of how easy it is to become swayed by the ‘recency effect’ - the last thing you read or hear impacting one’s judg bent, however the podcast, along with the recommended reading (Road to Damnation) does provide a lot of food for thought. As an ‘expert witness as well as content witness...”Read full review »

Rastius 2 via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/10/24

Not convinced

☆

“I remain unconvinced by anything in this program. Nothing new. Just opinion and discrediting witnesses and constant references to Helen Garner disrespectful”

Cbcbhyuionpy via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/24/24

Do you host a podcast?

Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.