Noticeably partisan in the worst ways
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“The hosts are blatantly in the tank for Trump, which is fine if they did not mention disapproval at one time or another for all of his policies. Which begs the question: If the hosts strongly disagree with Trump's economic, international policies, etc., why do they spend so much time exaggerating HRC's issues while discounting or just not mentioning Trump's? I have no idea! But, it absolutely degrades accurate, complete, and captivating political analysis. Personally, I find Left, Right and Center, NPR Politics, Keepin' It 1600, Vox The Weeds, as well as Radio Free GOP to be superior political podcasts in almost every way. Seriously, take notes on how often the hosts disagree with Trump and in the next breath support and attempt to provide advice to his campaign.
Bottom line, the hosts don't respect his policy, yet support him, while handily. I'm confounded on how this type of analysis is helpful to WSJ readers. Furthermore, their biased interpretation make it impossible for them to make predictions. Something they don't really do. Which is good for them seeing as their interpretation of events is usually off.
Why do I listen? Well, because I have an addiction to politics! So yeah, they are more honest than FNC, but that's setting the bar low.
All that said, if you don't care who wins and just want to bet on the election literally or in another financial way, this podcast will not be helpful.”Read full review »
JMH85JMH via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/21/16
More reviews of WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This show is a news show with a conservative slant. Thank God it is not a knee jerk love Trump show like so many others.”
Mmdean via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/18/17
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“Insightful conversations that I believe are unbiased in nature and present news and current events from a common sense point of view. I also enjoy the conflicting viewpoints and respectful conversations that ensue.”
thejacobbennett via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
01/13/18
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This used to be a thoughtful analysis of the news through the conservative viewpoint of the WSJ editorial page. However, it is increasingly an 3X/week apologia for the personal conduct of President Trump. POTUS will send out a non-factual tweet and then the WSJ editorial board works feverishly...”Read full review »
ceacliff via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
08/16/18
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
Listen now
Links
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
