“I enjoyed the info from this podcast and hearing from donor-conceived people, but the story line lacks nuance in ways I wish the writer would step up to. Somehow she side steps the nature vs. nurture debate entirely and doesn’t go into the question of who has the right to know what, whose privacy is important and legally protected and what does all that mean? It’s not simple or black and white. There’s a whole interesting discussion completely missed, for one example.
Also, the donor conceived people have repeatedly said that they do not identify their donor as their (many have someone else who is their father, for better or worse) , but the host keeps coming back to calling the donor their dad, father, biological father, etc. As people who have struggled with the identity complications of building families in unconventional ways, this disregard for their identification of their donor, is at best tone deaf and cringy, and at worst very offensive. As if she has the right to define this for them or knows better…
I am hoping that they circle back to how other commercial sperm banks adopted the model of the racist, elitist Graham genius sperm bank. How did the model evolve? How did that racism at its root/foundation inform racism in current banks? What does that mean today?
I’m hoping it improves as it rolls out…”
Evanflux via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/01/22