“I’m a public defender and very open to considerations of a wrongful conviction. However the presentation of this defendant’s innocence is unpersuasive, overlooks other explanations of evidence, and generally relies on criticisms unrelated to key evidence. This defendant may be innocent but the arguments here simply do not make that case. I’m not sure what the hosts believe they’re doing but it’s not helping this man’s situation. If he is innocent, his attorneys should ask the Inquirer to put someone else on this journalistic exercise. Suspicious music and random speculation doesn’t do anything but weaken the credibility of his defense. Shameful job.”
Footypj via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
02/20/22