“Let's, at the very least, be candid here. Jack Clark, former correspondent for the New Yorker and well articulated, presents a well-thought-out and intriguing "media" weapon to chew on. Mr. Clark clearly puts forth his silently-acknowledged initiative to base arguments purely on fact, and allow listeners to hear clips, quotes, and paraphrases from Washington and the media. For fairness, Clark may be a bit trivial when stating his goals and the Republican "atrocities", but the fact remains that at least he knows what he is talking about (not quite as much can be said for Hannity or Limbaugh), and he believes it. While most of us here see no point in dignifying the lowly pahtetic attempts at insults to Clark's reputation with a response, let me just set the tone: you may not like Clark's style, but it is only subsequent to his non-conformity and attitute-based-on-fact. Of course Clark only portrays the Democrat's arguments: thats the point of the show, to provide a revelation and shed light on the hypocrisy of our leaders, political and media. If he gave them the benefit of the doubt, it would defeat the purpose. Ego sum via lux et veritas.”
Ben Wofford via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/20/06