Very bad journalism
After listening to this regardless of how dodgy jay is , the journalism is appalling. Not impartial and did not just represent the facts. Jay is clearly a very deceptive character but the facts are the witnesses were not reliable. A sad case for the victims and the journalism was very weak.
Jadeo shmado via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 05/25/16
More reviews of Bowraville
I enjoy retrospective cold cases and hope that this podcast is followed up with any new findings and evidence however I was thorough disappointed with the journalists interview with the alleged at the end of the series , there were so many questions that could have been asked and answers left...Read full review »
kgghgfghnbgfdh via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 05/21/19
This crime podcast is so sloppy! It falls flat when it comes to presenting a case with thorough research and balanced analysis of events, witnesses and police and court proceedings. Other crime podcasts do it so well. Not this one. Two journalists driving round in a car to get a feel for their...Read full review »
Haich via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 07/15/18
I actually went to School with Clinton Speedy, so I was very interested in this case. Dan Box sounded too accusing towards Jay Hart, and in the end, I now think he is innocent. The final episode allows him to state his side of the case, and he makes a lot more sense than Dan. Worth a listen for...Read full review »
Not so good. via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 04/15/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »