P values and paper summaries are not interesting
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
“This is the worst possible format to read a series of studies and P values. The podcast would be much better spent having interactive discussions with the journal authors for them to describe in their own words the significance and import of each piece of work. The current format is no better than having some kind of artificial intelligence that scrubs abstract for key findings recite them to you. Horrible format and reading. The fact that it enjoys a four star rating boggles my mind. Maybe Dr. Wong has his mother, relatives, and rotating students chime in with reviews.”
Dominic Lahar via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
11/15/19
More reviews of Circulation
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Listen now
Links
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
Patreon
Genres
Artwork or description wrong?
Request an update »
Updates may take a few minutes.
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
