“Lots of press for this show as being sex positive ... but there are few positive presentations of sex here (the possible exception being one of the canned fantasies). And then there had to be the scene of the men at the investment company having a laugh about how dumb women’s sexual fantasies are. Of course there did. Ditto how the “stripper” was treated (emphasis added all over the script, as is typical) ... she gets moralized about in all the usual ways sex workers get moralized about, and also sexually abuses the main character culminating with the fantasy session she forces. Double yuck. The main character passes from one triggeringly abusive non consensual social, work, psychiatric, & sexual encounter immediately to another. In the end, she’s left with nothing but to submit to one of her abusers or be destroyed. Is that supposed to feel like a positive “choice?” But yep. There’s lots of sexual content. It’s present. Plus 2 stars for pretty decent acting and sound editing, as one would expect from QCode, and really should remove them for creepy abusive material throughout. That psychiatrist withholding medication was especially gross. GoodWood as a name for a *women’s* sex fantasy site? Really?”
~ Violet ~ via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/30/20