Not worth it
The hosts seem to view this podcast as a corrective to other sources that approach SCOTUS decisions from an exclusively political lens. It is a reasonably good listen when the hosts bring subject matter expertise to the table and get more deeply into doctrine than other coverage. But it is cringe listen when it devolves into Dan goading Will into defending various positions, and Will responding with the kind of whataboutisms that only law professors can tolerate, while declining to offer his own views. (One episode daring to ask - are Justice Gorsuch’s complaints about Biden’s COVID-era policies really no different than complaints about Japanese internment? Um, ok?). No matter your preference, there are better podcasts out there.
troubleisbruen via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/25/23
More reviews of Divided Argument
Please keep it up!
ZeeStro via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 06/04/21
I started following the show in my 2L year and haven’t missed an episode since. Professor Baude and Professor Epps keep their discussion accessible, yet highly nuanced and detailed. Their balanced discussions are especially useful for those still developing their ideological views about...Read full review »
Aaron_ACL_1 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 11/28/22
Dan and Will bring the listener along with their contemplations about many issues facing the Court. Their serious analysis is impressive and not shrill.
Elaine Mittleman via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/22/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »