CDR
Always a good listen, however: In the episode re CDR, David somewhat flippantly compared Danielle Smith’s review and potential claim on the CPP with Alberta’s “responsibility” for GHG emissions. To put the two issues on a time equivalent basis, one has to compare cumulative emissions since 1965 with the (arguably tenuous) CPP claim. Current emissions don’t do it. On a cumulative basis since 1965, Alberta has emitted a way smaller proportion of the country’s GHG’s than the 53% claim on CPP. I couldn’t find the cumulative provincial emissions, but Alberta’s cumulative emissions over the relevant period may well not be much larger than Ontario’s. Alberta’s CPP claim may be questionable, but the David’s analogy is also questionable and may only become more relevant with significantly more annual emissions over time from Alberta.
vodka1950 via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 12/02/23
More reviews of Energy vs Climate
Really enjoy this podcast as it discusses the energy transition, the success it has already had, the barriers going forward, the world of finance, mining, oil and gas, and all in an Alberta and Canada context. It’s great and very informative.
Zack Fillmore via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 11/27/20
Energy vs. Climate is a must listen for policy makers and anyone interested in the science, politics, and economics behind climate and energy transition issues in Canada.
Keith McLaughlin via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 10/10/20
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »