Description
Dan Quintana and James Heathers chat about well-known psychology studies that we've now lost confidence in due to replication failures and the role of auxiliary assumptions in hypothesis-driven research.
Other links
The reversals in psychology website
Anne Scheel and team's paper on whether you’re ready to test hypotheses
Homer Simpson burning bridges meme
The paper that suggests replications will make psychology too boring and nobody will want to study it
Daniel Lakens’ blog post on the hungry judges study
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 5) "135: A loss of confidence", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GHKRC
Sponsored By:
Paperpile: Paperpile is the reference manager you’ll actually want to use. Paperpile works seamlessly with Google Docs and Word for inserting citations and generating references lists. Paperpile’s iOS and Android apps also make it easy to add and read papers on the go. Everything Hertz listeners get 20% off a Paperpile subscription with the coupon code "hertz" (valid until January 1st, 2022).
Promo Code: hertzSupport Everything Hertz
Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
Other things they cover and links:
Which studies should we spend time replicating?
The business models of...
Published 05/02/24
Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources.
Other things they cover:
Should there be an annual limit on publications (even if this were somehow possible)?
The downsides of PhD by...
Published 04/03/24