Description
James proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree
Other links and things we discuss
An update on James’ start up job
The American service industry
Dan’s first outing since the pandemic started
The villlage of Hell, in Norway
The villiage of F*****g (now changed to Fugging) in Austria
The Hertz long term archive on Open Science Framework
We’re up for doing a syllabus episodes that you can assign to your classes
Dan’s recent piece in Nature Human Behavior on replication projects for undergraduate research theses
What about a replication study as part of a PhD thesis?
The trope of, “future replications are needed’
Collaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP)
Daniel Lakens mentioning that his paper might be the most cited Frontiers article ever
How thorough should peer review be?
James' new articles isn't online yet, but he will pin it to his Twitter profile as soon as it is
The Julian Koenig-led paper James mentioned (that Dan and James are co-authors on)
The Psychophysiology liviing meta-analysis article
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) "140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW65N
Support Everything Hertz
Dan and James discuss why innovation in scientific publishing is so hard, an emerging consortium peer review model, and a recent replication of the 'refilling soup bowl' study.
Other things they cover and links:
Which studies should we spend time replicating?
The business models of...
Published 05/02/24
Dan and James discuss how scientific research often neglects the importance of maintenance and long-term access for scientific tools and resources.
Other things they cover:
Should there be an annual limit on publications (even if this were somehow possible)?
The downsides of PhD by...
Published 04/03/24