“All of Dr. Mike’s episodes are great. ALL OF THEM.
Except this one. Vague, mansplaining, theoretical. Seemed like Dr. Mike was having a hard time pulling insight out of Dr. Johnson.
Dr. Johnson’s insight about having a decision to make between two similar things versus two distinctly different things and that it’s easier to make a decision between two similar things (he makes the example of going to Vegas and going to the mountains) than it is for two distinctly different things, was very unclear about why he felt this was the case; I was hoping Dr. Mike would do the “double click” as he likes to say, but after getting another vague answer, he moved on to the next subject.
For me, what makes the episodes great is that the guest is speaking about their experiences in terms of finding mastery and by those specific examples the theories behind the subject become much clearer and more practical for use.
It didn’t start to get interesting until Dr. Mike admitted he wasn’t a good decider. But by that point, the episode was almost over. To me, that’s where the episode started.
I wanted to hear about how masters of craft make decisions. And how they call audibles and adjust and what they did to improve on making decisions. Clearer insights on how decision architects lead us into making bad decisions and what we can do to be more aware of that.”
Vinnie D #23 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
04/28/22