Review of History of Art - Hard to understand without images

Hard to understand without images

☆

“Currently listening to the first lecture. The speaker at one point mentions that the 'screen is flickering'. I had already realized that the speaker was discussing images that were appearing on a screen. In this format there are no images - art history without images is worthless. Do not bother. This is an utter waste of time. The speaker saying, "the heart doest that, it doesn't do that" when talking about movement with no image makes it impossible to get his point. There is nothing that can be learned here.”

Challst via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/20/11

More reviews of History of Art

See all »

Good, but no visuals

☆

“The lectures are very informative, but are evidently given with an accompanying slide deck which is not shown in iTunes U. Adding this deck as a video to accompany the lecture would make the points much more clearly, and would remove the need to keep stopping the course to look up an image of the...”Read full review »

GroveSprightly via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 01/02/15

No Art in Art History

☆

“The Martin Kemp lectures are awful. The man can’t stop talking about himself long enough to convince me that he knows anything about art. I realize this was a special valedictory lecture, but I felt terrible for the audience sitting through it. I hope the regular lectures in Art History at...”Read full review »

Kimibot via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/29/11

Do you host a podcast?

Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.

Get Chartable Analytics »