Tries To Straddle Professional/Layperson Presentation
Hats off to the moderator and producers for trying something different on this podcast. But my issue is the seemingly simplistic definitions of the subject being discussed and patient testimonials that repeat what any practicing doctor already knows. I suspect the vast majority of listeners are medical professionals and will know what atrial fibrillation is, and what a patient typically experiences with whatever pathology. Most practicing physicians will have heard it many times. I suspect the producers are trying to appeal to a lay audience. But this means a professional listener has to sit thru a lot of irrelevance.
skshrews via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 03/23/19
More reviews of JAMA Clinical Reviews
Excellent guests and short but detailed episodes
BZT28 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/22/18
Been listening a while now and I love it. It goes into enough medical depth to apply to doctors like GP or others. It covers major topics and it’s Easy to listen to. There’s often discussions with other experts in the field. I just wish they would make more, as I wouldn’t complain about that :)
Sina1260 via Apple Podcasts · Norway · 11/30/17
As a pharmacist, I was hoping to develop more of a holistic picture of disease states beyond drug therapy with these podcasts. Very minimal focus on dietary/lifestyle modifications- not a great message to get across newer clinicians.
PharmD123 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/22/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »