“Josh Barro asks the probing questions. Ken White provides the legal analysis. Often times, attorneys-as-legal-pundits offer observations in which partisan talking points are torturously hammered into something that is a “legal opinion” in name only. Not true with ATPL.
Playing off Josh’s topical questions, drawing on his years of experience as an AUSA and criminal defense attorney, Ken offers an objective legal analysis that fails to follow any political philosophy. Sometimes the conclusion agrees with a political position, many times it does not.
If there is one negative about this podcast, it’s that we can’t claim CLE credit after listening!”
Senor_Wences via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
06/21/19