“I was really excited about this podcast but I had to turn it off after the second episode. I think a podcast exploring inequities in publishing could be really great! But a podcast posing as unsolved weirdies, that then just preaches for 45 minutes without any concrete evidence is lame. I want to know WHY Dan Mallory did what he did, and a deep dive into the physical infrastructure that allowed him to do so. Not an interview with a completely unrelated author and a vague thesis statement about abuses of power. Doesn’t matter how right you are, soapboxing (especially in podcast form) is always irritating.”
n9006 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/30/22