Link to bioRxiv paper: http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.26.23293188v1?rss=1 Authors: Drysdale, M., Galimov, E. R., Yarwood, M. J., Patel, V., Levick, B., Gibbons, D. C., Watkins, J. D., Young, S., Pierce, B. F., Lloyd, E. J., Kerr, W., Birch, H. J., Kamalati, T., Brett, S. J. Abstract: Introduction: There is uncertainty regarding how in vitro antibody neutralisation activity translates to the clinical efficacy of sotrovimab against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, although real-world evidence has demonstrated continued effectiveness during both BA.2 and BA.5 predominance. We previously reported descriptive results from the Discover dataset for patients treated with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or patients at highest risk per National Health Service (NHS) criteria but who were untreated. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of sotrovimab compared with no early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment in highest-risk patients with COVID-19. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using the Discover dataset in North West London. Patients had to be non-hospitalised at index, aged greater than or equal to 12 years old and meet greater than or equal to 1 of the NHS highest-risk criteria for receiving early COVID-19 treatment with sotrovimab. The primary objective was to assess the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalisation and/or COVID-19-related death within 28 days of the observed/imputed treatment date between patients treated with sotrovimab and highest-risk patients who received no early COVID-19 treatment. We also performed subgroup analyses for patients aged less than 65 and greater than or equal to 65 years, patients with renal dysfunction, and by Omicron subvariant prevalence period (BA.1/2 emergence: 1 December 2021-12 February 2022 [period 1]; BA.2 reaching and at its peak: 13 February-31 May 2022 [period 2]; BA.2 falling and BA.4/5 emergence: 1 June-31 July 2022 [period 3]). Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores was used to adjust for measured known and likely confounders between the cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models with stabilised weights were performed to assess hazard ratios (HRs). Results: A total of 599 highest-risk patients treated with sotrovimab and 5,191 untreated highest-risk patients were included. Compared with untreated patients, sotrovimab treatment reduced the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death by 50% (HR=0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24, 1.06); however, statistical significance was not reached (p=0.07). In addition, sotrovimab reduced the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation by 57% (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.18, 1.00) compared with the untreated group, although also not statistically significant (p=0.051). Among patients aged greater than or equal to 65 years and patients with renal disease, sotrovimab treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation, by 89% (HR=0.11; 95% CI 0.02, 0.82; p=0.03) and 82% (HR=0.18; 95% CI 0.05, 0.62; p=0.007), respectively. In period 1, sotrovimab treatment was associated with a 75% lower risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death compared with the untreated group (HR=0.25; 95% CI 0.07, 0.89; p=0.032). In periods 2 and 3, HRs of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death were 0.53 (95% CI 0.14, 2.00; p=0.35) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.23, 2.69; p=0.69), respectively, for the sotrovimab versus untreated groups, but differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Sotrovimab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation in patients aged greater than or equal to 65 years and those with renal disease compared with the untreated cohort. For the overall cohort, the risk of hospitalisation following sotrovimab treatment was also lower compared with the untreated group; however, this did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.051). The risk of hospitalisation and/or death was lower for the sot