Not objective
NOT an objective reporting! Nick Wallis claims to have an objective take, but the way he asks questions, including his tone of voice, commentary he makes, and speakers he selects all show his bias and subjective take. I will assume he has been paid to report on this trial - and we can by now assume by which side. Terrible and one sided
FashionMaven123 via Apple Podcasts · France · 05/25/22
More reviews of Reporting: Depp v Heard
This podcast contains very little fact readout from the trial. This guy ‘interviews’ crazy JD fans on the bench outside the courthouse. That’s it. Nothing else. And the people he interviews… whoa. One lady said she was confident Depp didn’t do anything because she met JD as a fan a few times...Read full review »
SARS9876 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/02/22
Have sat in the galley and have seen the jurors and their responses and sometimes they are very different then what’s reported. One particular one tends to nap often. That said, I went into the trial unbiased. I’ve only seen one film between the two of them. I have to say, I do believe Depp was...Read full review »
Zuma655 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/07/22
Our “NEWS REPORTS” here in the US seem at type very leastUninformed, and at most biased. I’m very much looking forward to listening to your podcast as well as following you on Twitter! Thank you so much.
patcasey747 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 04/11/22
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »