“This has the potential to do so much good and bridge a gap, to truly provide knowledge of a system that is misunderstood on so many levels because it’s not as public as some would like. Here we find that the narrator is given an opportunity and unprecedented access to people on both sides of the court room, but instead of truly laying out the facts as they stand and playing out actual interviews, we find the narrator giving synopses of recorded interviews and drawing the conclusions for us. Why not lay out the facts and let viewers draw their own conclusions based on all the information you have gathered, or... would that not fit the agenda here ?”
hartly amused via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
09/27/19