“If you want to debunk anything then first consider ALL the facts and questions around controversial things in detail and with an objective open mind. Otherwise you are just as ignorant as a “conspiracy theorist”. Many debunkers fail to even see this in themselves. It’s naive and unscientific to simply call something a conspiracy theory and then argue your opinion. This approach isn’t science. You have to understand the issue from every angle before a judgement can be made. Debunkers rarely do this. They usually end their inquiry after looking at only a few aspects and even then they don’t even research these aspects properly. A good debunker is a good scientist. Any result - conspiracy or not - should be scrutinised comprehensively and without bias. History has shown time and again that some conspiracy theories have later turned out to be factual. Obviously some are just ridiculous, eg flat earth, qanon etc but others have significant merit and deserve your attention because there are serious questions to be answered.”
Tate Causea via Apple Podcasts ·
Australia ·
10/23/21