“I was looking forward to hearing some critical thinking from Chris and Rachel, challenging specific theories of Graham Hancock with specific evidence and data. But disappointingly, their narrative is reduced to lazy, broad brush dismissal with Rachel seemingly switching from outright mockery to tacit agreement. There would have been so much more value if they had taken on a few of Hancock’s point head on, specifically… but they don’t. I wonder why that is..?”
The Chairman DB via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
11/27/22