Ep.195 - It could have been SO much better.
I was looking forward to hearing some critical thinking from Chris and Rachel, challenging specific theories of Graham Hancock with specific evidence and data. But disappointingly, their narrative is reduced to lazy, broad brush dismissal with Rachel seemingly switching from outright mockery to tacit agreement. There would have been so much more value if they had taken on a few of Hancock’s point head on, specifically… but they don’t. I wonder why that is..?
The Chairman DB via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 11/27/22
More reviews of The Archaeology Show
This podcast should come with a disclaimer. I am always looking for a great archaeology podcast that can be both informative and entertaining. However, this one did not meet the minimum expectation of presenting the data in an unbiased manner. There were quite a few times within each episode that...Read full review »
no waikiki for me via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/27/22
Love the mix of topics! Also wanted to thank y’all for acknowledging how unsafe the US is right now. Thank you for amazing work!
moriahmoriahmoriah via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/18/22
Just got done listening to episode 201. Oh my what a bunch of we are better then you because we are leftist archeologists. They found it easy to say how gross hobby lobby is while never taking museums and universities to task over their buying of looted artifacts. You are a prime example of...Read full review »
John VerValen via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/31/23
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »