Does the F bomb really add to the podcast?
Listened to your podcast for the first time and was impressed with the depth of discussion regarding the NHL draft first round. However, I was very disappointed in the use of the f-bombs and just don’t get why you feel the need to bring that to the discussion. It comes off as unprofessional and alienates those who may want to listen but have kids around a lot or just prefer not to hear that language. It’s a shame because without that this would be a top notch podcast. Perhaps you’ll consider reevaluating the need to use such colorful language. It does not add value or to your cool factor and just seemed out of place with the bulk of the show. Your show, your rules but just wanted to provide some feedback that might be of benefit. Couldn’t you just refrain from that for the sake of some of your audience? Given the current format, I’ll probably choose other avenues to get the info I’m looking for. Its a shame because your content was solid. Michael
Masmall99 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 07/08/22
More reviews of The Athletic Hockey Show
Is this podcast still active?
Boyinthepenaltybox via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 05/31/22
The advertisements are too long and too abrupt. Don’t start the show with a 2.5 min advertisement. You are turning off potential listeners. This pod cast has a long way to go before it can compete with The Full 60, Puck Soup and Spittin Chicklets
Shoeless Jack Johnson via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 10/07/21
Just listened to their segment about Mike Babcock, and F these guys. Two sides, rehabilitation, yadda, you just have to be kidding! Babcock should be permanently out of hockey but Mendez and McIndoe are looking forward to him being an NHL coach next year.
Kreylix via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/21/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »