Slickly Produced and Highly Engaging but Too Cheerful?
The BBC World Service has put quite a lot into the production of “The Climate Question,” their weekly podcast on climate change, and what we can do about it. Topics are timely and well-chosen. Field reporting from around the globe is relevant and professional. Keeping the length of the show at 25-30 minutes is generally a good idea. So, what’s the issue? Someone has decided that the show needs to remain light, upbeat, and entertaining no matter what the content. Neal and Graihagh are pleasant hosts but often try so hard to be cute and clever that your eyes can’t help but roll. On one hand, “The Climate Question” successfully avoids the doom and gloom, and getting bogged down in the details of scientific reports and forecasts, but on the other hand, it seems too determined to keep it all “fun” and cheerful. Let’s tone that part down a bit.
jtimothyknox via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 09/01/22
More reviews of The Climate Question
First ep was great. Intelligent and inviting - looking forward to more
podspodspods! via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 11/17/20
 I spent the past month listening through your entire programme archive. This is the most accessible, entertaining, enlightening, informative, well-researched, high production value, empathetic, sensitive programme on climate change I have ever watched, read or listened to. Even though every...Read full review »
michelleksfung via Apple Podcasts · Hong Kong · 02/18/22
Amazing podcast that throughly unpacks climate issues. Engaging and interesting
Natalie.Elise via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 06/11/21
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »