Irresponsible journalism
The moment when the narrator speaks with the witnesses about their statements at the time was really difficult to hear. The narrator crashes their world reopening difficult memories. In return she jumps to conclusions and torpedoes any future case against the primary suspect. Then she gives air time to the suspect who has every reason to lie and protect themselves. The evidence in the case is incredibly limited due to the police at the time harassing black athletes and failing to look at one of their own. No evidence doesn’t prove innocence it just ensures no chance of a conviction.
PurpleRedBlueGreen via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 07/31/23
More reviews of The Coldest Case In Laramie
This was a great listen and perfectly reported in every way. I can’t help but wonder if revisiting a case with nothing new to bring to the table is worth it anymore. So much has changed since Serial’s first season, including how much true crime we’ve all consumed. I think the bar is higher than a...Read full review »
sadie dark via Apple Podcasts · Australia · 02/25/23
A real quality piece of journalism that shows you don’t always need a neatly packaged ending to hit home. The interview with Garcia was particularly heart wrenching.
Harry the hermit via Apple Podcasts · Great Britain · 02/24/23
I appreciate any spotlight on an unsolved murder. The insider look into a small western town is inherently worthy, too, and is well done. Yet, I can’t say this podcast is particularly compelling. I think several key people where lying, perhaps shielding themselves from other crimes and...Read full review »
Painting4Evr via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/24/23
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »