Eric Goldman, associate dean of research at Santa Clara University School of Law, assesses concerns around the impending TikTok ban or buyout. It faces significant First Amendment challenges, he said. The debate over the potential TikTok ban, or forced sale under recent federal legislation, hinges on significant legal and constitutional challenges. Eight TikTok influencers have already filed a lawsuit, arguing the ban infringes on their First Amendment rights. Santa Clara University School of Law Associate Dean of Research Eric Goldman joins our Government A to Z, panel, drawing attention to the difficulties the government faces in justifying the ban, noting the lack of publicly available evidence on national security risks and the broader implications for free speech. Goldman suggests that the ban could set a precedent for digital trade barriers, leading to potential international retaliation and exacerbating political distrust among younger Americans. The conversation underscores the complex intersection of technology, law and public policy.TFIC co-host and Government Technology Staff Writer Ashley Silver along with two colleagues from Governing* — Staff Writer Zina Hutton and Digital Editor Zoe Manzanetti, react to Goldman's analysis in thinking about the future of TikTok in the lives of American users. They discuss the app's unique appeal, question whether its algorithm fosters deeper connections and consider the impact of a ban on users and the political landscape. SHOW NOTES Here are the top five takeaways from this episode:1. Legislative Actions: President Joe Biden signed a bill to ban TikTok if ByteDance, its Chinese owner, doesn't divest within a year. ByteDance has nine months to sell, with a potential three-month extension if it can demonstrate progress. 2. Legal Challenges: Eight TikTok influencers are suing the U.S. government, claiming the ban violates their First Amendment rights. Prior bans by the federal government, states and universities have already restricted TikTok usage on government devices. 3. Constitutional Concerns: Goldman argues the ban faces significant First Amendment challenges, as it affects users’ and the platform’s rights. The lack of public evidence on national security risks weakens the government’s case. 4. Economic and Social Impact: TikTok is a major platform for income and social interaction for millions, raising questions about the fairness of the ban. The ban could set a precedent for future digital trade barriers, affecting international relations. 5. Public Opinion and Political Pressure: Younger generations view the ban as a diversion from more pressing issues like housing and climate change. There’s a concern that a ban could increase distrust in the government, particularly among Gen Z and Alpha. Related Links to items referenced in the episode: Questions Swirl Over Future of TikTok Ownership What Would a TikTok Ban Mean? Our editors used ChatGPT 4.0 to summarize the episode in bullet form to help create the show notes. The main image for this story was created using DALL-E 3. *Governing and Government Technology are both part of e.Republic. Subscribe to The Futre In Context for free on YouTube or the podcast app of your choice — Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Audacy and Audible.