“Only listened to episode 1 so far. I listen to podcasts strictly for entertainment and I love true crime podcasts. I always pay particular attention to detail and try to look into things that don’t connect or don’t make sense. In episode 1 it clearly mentions the lead investigators were the PBPD who handed over evidence to the PB State Attorney (the prosecutor) who had no interest in pursuing a criminal case despite the overwhelming evidence. It was only after that the the PBPD Chief with to the US Attorney. Why aren’t the details of the State Attorney’s actions discussed in detail? To me and anyone who really wants to get to the bottom of it, that investigation has to be included. Who was the SA and why was he/she so lenient? The PBPD Chief surely opened up about that aspect as well if he opened up about the Fed prosecutorial process. Politics aside, both the state and fed prosecutors failed the victims. I just can’t wrap my mind around why the SA’s actions were not discussed in great detail. Am I missing something?? Three stars because title is terrible (-1) and details about SA left out (-1). Very interesting topics however.”
BigLewy2019 via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
10/08/19