“It seems that it early on the paper realized they had a hit on their hands and they expanded the number of episodes and their length.
Also, the position of the prosecutors is poorly defended. Look, Chris Dawson murdered his wife. We know that. But what PHYSICAL evidence do they have? They have a purely circumstantial case. Much of the “new evidence” is hearsay. Are people convicted on this basis? I guess, but absent any physical evidence, which the police bungled by not investigating properly in 1982, he might be very hard to convict.”
Aphilsphan via Apple Podcasts ·
United States of America ·
12/10/18