Good idea, but the podcast would benefit from more care
I very much like the underlying idea of the podcast and have learned things I otherwise would probably not have learned. That is great. However, if I compare this podcast to, for example, the revolutions podcast, then it is striking how much more care goes into the latter. The creator of the revolutions podcast makes sure that he has a justified opinion of his topics by reading the relevant literature. David seems to only do this occasionally, with the result that the podcast is not as clear and helpful as it could be. Sometimes I have to stop the podcast because I have the feeling that I do not get a reliable account here but just David reporting what he has read and what he thinks about that off the cuff without making sure that what he says on his podcast – which seems to reach thousands of people – is correct or at least a viable opinion. I begrudgingly return because I’d like to know at least something about the topics of this podcast, but I would be so much more happier would David put more care in this podcast. This could begin with him editing out at least some slips of the tongue or mispronounciations rather than just leaving everything in and so you hear him correct himself. This podcast has the potential to be truly helpful and great, so I hope my feedback is seen as constructive criticism.
Mathijßem via Apple Podcasts · Germany · 03/26/22
More reviews of Theory & Philosophy
Very easy to listen to, and gives great context! Awesome stuff! Keep it up!
arissoup1237 via Apple Podcasts · Canada · 12/12/22
Roy
Great podcast. Very interesting and detailed.
royz159- via Apple Podcasts · Israel · 11/05/19
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »