Compelling but room for improvement
Super compelling idea for a podcast and I would say fair execution of the first season. One potential suggestion for having several hosts is to identify the speaker (maybe during the editing process) or have the hosts indicate who they are as they are speaking (which I realize may disrupt the conversational flow). In the absence of one of these solutions, I would continue to find it hard to follow who is talking. My other feedback is that the Logan Ury, the show’s resident ‘behavioral scientist,’ doesn’t have much range beyond attachment theory, which although is evidenced based, has its limitations as any approach does. I wonder if the producers have considered consulting with someone with a bit more experience and therapeutic range? It appears Logan Ury has only Bachelor’s level formal education. While she is well-spoken, I find her general tone and cadence of speech to be unsettling and rushed. I am a clinician and behavioral scientist myself and might imagine the daters on the show would benefit from someone with a bit more poise, equanimity, and expertise. Ester Perel is, of course, a leader in the field and would add exponentially, beyond what she already does, to this show. And, yet I realize it may not be a realistic suggestion to add more of her to the show. Perhaps there is someone else who isn’t quite at the Ester Perel level but who is a step above Logan. I think that person is out there. Actually, I think Jesse Baker may be a good fit. I find her perspective to be spot on therapeutically. While she may not have formal training, her work with Ester may have imparted a high level of wisdom. I think the delivery and content of her commentary is spot on.
PenelopeJane20 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 08/06/22
More reviews of This Is Dating
I have really enjoyed this podcast but agree that having it subscription based is sort of crazy considering the amount of content available. Would prefer they do ads in order to make money instead of asking new listeners to have to subscribe without getting much in return. If they had 100...Read full review »
jade658666 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 02/22/22
I paid to subscribe & notice there is no new content on any kind of regular schedule. Feel a little ripped off. Also the hosts don’t seem to be very relationship savvy, but Logan is a great contribution
michellec93 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/23/22
I really like the concept of the podcast. There’s great potential. The thing that doesn’t work for me is hearing some of the dates and thinking “oh they really aren’t a match” and then the host doing the recap of the date and saying how great they thought the date was. I’m like did we listen to...Read full review »
emzy0909 via Apple Podcasts · United States of America · 01/06/24
Do you host a podcast?
Track your ranks and reviews from Spotify, Apple Podcasts and more.
See hourly chart positions and more than 30 days of history.
Get Chartable Analytics »