“The host comes across a an avid sceptic and never gives a balanced perspective, but always focuses on the arguments against each case they are reviewing, and never has a fore or against argument of the case. For this reason, I am forced to remove the show from my playlist, as I am looking for a balanced view point from hosts of these types of shows. They are not experts on the topic, just observers/researchers.
At the end of the day, this topic is ambiguous at best and already starts from a position of disbelief. To constantly be cherry picking negative outlooks against the sources to each case, is misleading to followers of the show that’s not a healthy route to discourse on this subject.”
FearlessJP via Apple Podcasts ·
Great Britain ·
02/26/24